Mastering Field Shooting Positions: Practical Stability When the Moment Counts

 

Standing, either offhand or braced, is the least stable but most frequently used field position.

An almost universal truth is that when most of us set up our rifle and zero it in for the hunt, we do so from the bench. But experienced hunters know the truth: the field rarely gives you the perfect shot. You may plan to settle into a rock‑solid benchrest position, but real hunting situations usually don’t work that way. Terrain, brush, time pressure, and the unpredictable behavior of game animals all conspire to make the “ideal” shooting position a rarity. More often than not, you’re forced to adapt, and do so rapidly!

Over decades of hunting in varied terrain, from high desert washes to thick northern woods, I’ve learned that most of my shots come from a standing or kneeling position. I love the stability of sitting or lying prone, but those positions often require time and space and are often not possible with tall grass or ground cover between you and the target. When it’s time to take the shot, you work with what the land gives you. And the more comfortable you are with each field position, the more confident you’ll be when the crosshairs settle, and the opportunity is in the moment.

If you asked a dozen experienced woodland hunters which position they use most often, the majority would say standing, either offhand or braced. It’s the quickest stance to assume, it clears brush better than anything else, and it allows you to cover a wide area without losing mobility. But it’s also the least stable. Standing offhand is a fleeting position; you can hold it for so long before muscle fatigue starts to wobble your sight picture.

To get the most out of standing, start with your feet placed roughly 90 degrees to the target. This creates a natural, balanced platform. For right-handed shooters, raise the rifle butt firmly into your right shoulder, then settle your cheek onto the stock. This cheek weld is critical as it helps to lock your head in place and keeps your sight alignment consistent.

Breathing matters here more than in any other position. Take a couple of quick breaths, let half of the last one out, and hold. That brief pause is your shooting window. Wrap your trigger hand around the pistol grip, settle your finger gently on the trigger, and make sure your eye isn’t too close to the scope. I was tracking a baboon in S. Africa, using a .50-caliber big-bore PCP to follow him up a hillside. I was shooting offhand, and when he made a brief pause on his upward climb, I quickly pulled the trigger without taking the time to lock in my position. The rifle kicked straight back, hitting me full in the face, and I spent the next several days with a discolored ring around my right eye. Some say that scope bite is a rite of passage but once is enough.

Standing is a quick position to take, lets you move quickly, and allows shots over ground cover.

In open country, especially high desert, finding a natural rest can be nearly impossible. I’ve gotten into the habit of carrying shooting sticks everywhere I hunt. They turn a shaky offhand stance into a workable, controlled shot. Even a single‑leg monopod can make a world of difference when the wind picks up, and your heart is pounding.

If I could choose only one field position for the rest of my hunting life, I’d pick sitting. It’s stable, natural, and surprisingly adaptable. Sitting gives you a solid platform without the sprawl of prone, and it’s far more forgiving than standing. The downside is that dropping into a sitting position can spook game if you’re not careful. Movement is your enemy, and sitting requires more of it than kneeling or standing.

To assume a proper sitting stance, angle your body about 90 degrees to the target. Bring your left foot close to your body and let the knee rise. Curl your right foot toward your left side, raising the right knee just enough to support your posture. This creates a tripod of sorts; your two knees and your backside form a stable base.

Shoulder the rifle as you normally would but rest your left elbow on your left knee. This simple contact point transforms your stability. The elbow‑to‑knee connection creates a rigid triangle that absorbs movement and steadies your sight picture. Hunters often underestimate how much stability comes from this single adjustment.

Sitting also pairs beautifully with shooting sticks. A set of lightweight collapsible sticks can turn a good sitting position into an excellent one. As I have mentioned in other blog posts, I rely on the Primos Polecat shooting sticks as they are stable and compact, yet quick to deploy. In tall grass or low brush, sitting gives you just enough elevation to see clearly while still keeping your profile low. Just watch where you are sitting. I can’t tell you the number of times I’ve sat on a cactus or sharp rock when quickly dropping to my backside.

Kneeling is a variation on sitting, but it’s faster to assume and better suited for situations where you need a little more height. If you’re trying to shoot over grass, sage, or low brush, kneeling often gives you the perfect compromise between speed and stability.

Drop your right knee to the ground and keep your left knee raised. Place the elbow of your leading arm on your left knee. This creates a stable rest similar to the sitting position but with more elevation. Kneeling also allows you to pivot quickly, which can be a lifesaver when game animals don’t follow your script.

Add shooting sticks to the kneeling position and you’ll be surprised how steady it becomes. The combination of elbow‑to‑knee support and a forward rest can rival the stability of sitting, especially if the terrain is uneven or rocky.

Nothing beats prone for pure accuracy. It’s the steadiest field position by far, and when you can use it, your confidence skyrockets. But prone is also the hardest position to assume without making noise or losing sight of your quarry. In desert country, prone comes with another challenge: you never really know what you’re lying on. Rocks, cactus spines, and fire ants have a way of reminding you that the ground is not always your friend.

When cresting a rise, shooting into a wash, or glassing from a ridge, the prone position is hard to beat. Lie flat with the rifle in front of you and angle your body slightly to the right of the target line. Place your left elbow forward of your torso and tuck your right elbow slightly closer in. Your rifle and upper body should be supported by these two points of contact.

Pull the rifle into your shoulder with your left hand, settle your cheek on the stock, and wrap your right hand around the pistol grip. This position is enhanced by using a rest; your pack, a rolled jacket, or even a flat rock can make a huge difference. Shooting sticks don’t help much here, but a bipod is hard to beat. In fact, a good bipod can turn prone into a near‑benchrest experience. About the only time I mount a bipod to my rifle is for long-range prairie dog shooting in the flat open grasslands.

Prone forces you to think carefully about your surroundings. In desert terrain, you may be lying on sand, gravel, or thorny vegetation. In mountain country, you may be on uneven ground or loose shale. Always take a quick glance before dropping prone; you don’t want to discover a rattlesnake or a patch of cholla the hard way. I know this is a recurring theme, but I speak from a lot of painful experiences.

Field shooting is improvisation. The more comfortable you are with each position, standing, sitting, kneeling, and prone, the more confident you’ll be when the moment of truth arrives. Practice them all. Don’t just shoot from a bench or a controlled environment. Get out into the field, find uneven ground, shoot uphill and downhill, and learn how your body and rifle behave under real conditions.

The terrain won’t ask your preference. It will force you to adapt. And when the crosshairs settle and your breathing steadies, the hours you’ve spent mastering these positions will pay off in the only currency that matters in hunting: clean, ethical, confident shots.

Categories: Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Shooting Uphill or Into a Tree: The Ballistics Every Squirrel Hunter Needs to Know

Spend a day in the squirrel woods and you’ll learn quickly that most of your shots won’t be level. In fact, if you hunt the Midwest hardwoods long enough, you’ll go entire mornings without a single ground shot. Every fox squirrel seems to be halfway up a hickory, and every gray squirrel seems to be clinging to the underside of a branch like a feather‑weight acrobat. That means you’re shooting steeply uphill, often at odd angles, and usually while trying to thread a pellet through a maze of twigs.

My first season of serious squirrel hunting taught me this lesson the hard way. I’d spent years plinking on level ground, punching paper at 25 and 30 yards, and getting pretty confident with my zero. But confidence evaporates fast when you’re missing squirrels that seem like chip shots. I’d aim dead‑on at a broadside fox squirrel 30 yards up a maple, squeeze the trigger, and watch the pellet sail over its back. I’d adjust, aim lower, and still miss. It drove me crazy until I finally dug into the physics behind uphill and downhill shooting. What I learned changed the way I hunt, and it might change the way you shoot too.

In the squirrel woods, a high percentage of shoots will be up into the trees or down into valleys and hillsides.

A lot of shooters assume that shooting uphill makes the pellet drop more, and shooting downhill makes it drop less. It feels intuitive. If you’re shooting uphill, the pellet must be fighting gravity more, right? And if you’re shooting downhill, gravity must be helping it along.

But that’s not how gravity works on a projectile. Firearms hunters have studied this problem for decades, especially those who hunt in steep mountain country. Their findings apply perfectly to air rifles and pellets. The truth is simple: At the same slant distance, the pellet’s vertical drop is the same whether you shoot level, uphill, or downhill.

That means: The pellet does not slow down faster when shooting uphill, the pellet does not speed up when shooting downhill, and gravity pulls on the pellet the same way no matter the angle. So why do we miss high on both uphill and downhill shots? Because the pellet’s horizontal distance is shorter than the slant distance you’re ranging.

 

Garvity only cares about horizontal distance. This is the key concept. Gravity acts straight down, perpendicular to the earth. It doesn’t care about the slope you’re shooting on. It only affects the pellet over the horizontal distance it travels.

When you range a squirrel 30 yards up a tree, that’s the slant range—the straight‑line distance between you and the target. But the pellet doesn’t “feel” that entire 30 yards. It only “feels” the horizontal component of that distance.

This is where trigonometry comes in. Think back to rhe Cosine Rule, in which the horizontal distance is equal to: Horizontal Range = Slant Range × Cosine(Angle). Let’s plug in real numbers. Your rifle is zeroed at 30 yards. You range a squirrel at a 30‑yard slant distance. The squirrel is sitting at a 30‑degree angle above you and the cosine(30°) = 0.87. So, the  Horizontal Range = 30 × 0.87 = 26 yards

Your pellet behaves exactly as if you were shooting 26 yards on level ground, not 30. If you aim using your 30‑yard zero, your pellet will strike high, because you’re over‑holding for the actual horizontal distance. This is why both uphill and downhill shots hit high. The slant range is always longer than the horizontal range, and your pellet drop is based only on the horizontal distance.

For a real-woods example, picture this: You’re walking a ridge and spot a gray squirrel perched on a limb 25 yards away—slant distance. The angle is steep, maybe 35 degrees. You shoulder your rifle, settle the crosshairs, and squeeze. You miss high.

Why? Because the pellet only traveled the horizontal equivalent of about 20 yards. Your 25‑yard zero is too much hold for that shorter horizontal distance. Now imagine the same squirrel downhill on a creek bank. Same slant distance, same angle. You aim dead‑on again. You miss high again. Different direction, same physics.

Squirrel hunting is full of steep angles. In flat farmland you might get more level shots, but in mature hardwoods—especially oaks, hickories, and walnuts—squirrels spend most of their time above eye level. And when mast is heavy, they’re practically glued to the canopy.

That means most of your shots are uphill, many are steep uphill, some are downhill across ravines or creek bottoms, but almost none are perfectly level when hunting in the woods or canyon areas. If you don’t understand angle shooting, you’ll miss more often than you should.

When shooting downhill, the same rules apply.

Here’s the tricky part: In the woods, you rarely know the exact angle or slant distance. You’re not pulling out a rangefinder and protractor while a squirrel is flicking its tail at you. So you need a rule of thumb. My general rule of thumb is that if the shot is uphill or downhill—even slightly—aim lower than your normal point of aim. How much lower depends on: your rigs zero distance, the steepness of the angle, the slant range, and the pellet’s trajectory

But here’s a practical guideline: At 20–35 yards, most uphill or downhill shots require you to hold ½ to 1 full mil‑dot lower. If you’re shooting a scope with aim points or mil-dots, this becomes easy. If you’re shooting open sights, you’ll need to develop a feel for it.

The best way to master angle shooting is to practice it deliberately. A drill I use is to set a target at 25–30 yards. Place it 10–15 feet above ground level (tree, hill, or elevated stand). Shoot from below at a steep angle. Note how much lower you must aim to hit center. You can repeat this same exercise shooting downwards and you’ll quickly see how dramatic the difference can be.

Fieldcraft Tips for Real Hunts:  Don’t Over‑Range the Target, If you’re using a rangefinder, remember it gives you slant distance. Your pellet drop is based on horizontal distance, which is always shorter. If the squirrel looks far away but is high up, assume the horizontal distance is shorter than it appears. If you know your 30‑yard zero well, compare the squirrel’s horizontal distance to familiar ground markers. A 25‑yard zero is often more forgiving for angle shooting than a 35‑yard zero, which might be a consideration if you’ll be hunting the deeper woods. Heavier pellets with slower velocities exaggerate the effect and lighter pellets flatten it slightly.

Whether you’re shooting uphill into a towering oak or downhill into a creek bottom, the pellet will strike higher than it would on level ground at the same slant distance. Gravity acts only on the horizontal component of the shot, not on the full line‑of‑sight distance.

Once you understand that, and once you start aiming lower on every slanted shot—you’ll stop missing squirrels that should have been easy. You’ll make cleaner, more confident shots, and you’ll spend a lot less time muttering under your breath in the woods. Angle shooting isn’t complicated. It’s just misunderstood. Master it, and your squirrel‑hunting success rate will jump overnight.

Categories: Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Is a Chronograph Useful for Airgun Hunting?

A chronograph is one of the most valuable and overlooked tools an airgun hunter can own. Airguns operate in a narrow performance band where small changes in velocity can dramatically affect accuracy, trajectory, and terminal performance. A chronograph gives hunters the hard data needed to keep their rifles at peak performance in the field.

Airguns don’t have the luxury of excess energy. A shift of just 30-40 fps can move your point of impact enough to turn a clean kill into a wounded animal. That’s why understanding a rifle’s true velocity, not the number printed on the box, is essential.
What a chronograph does for a hunter is to help ensure velocity consistency, revealing the extreme spread and standard deviation, the two numbers that determine whether your rifle is predictable. It allows evaluation of a regulator’s health by detecting creeping, dropping, or unstable behavior before accuracy degrades.

A chronograph helps you identify the best rifle-and-ammo combination by showing which pellets or slugs your barrel shoots most consistently. Even projectiles with the same shape and weight can perform very differently from one manufacturer to another. If you need a specific setup for a particular hunting application, chronograph data lets you tune the rifle for optimal performance with that projectile.

My portable shooting bench and the gear I use. Calipers, pellet scales, lazer bore sighter, trigger pull gauge, notebook, bipod, on a portable shooting table. Can take this anywhere to test guns.

Measurements from the chronograph are used to map the trajectory of your rifle-and-ammo combination, turning the output of a ballistic application from guesswork into very accurate metrics by feeding it real velocity data. In essence, this confirms whether adjustments to the hammer spring, transfer port, or regulator actually improved performance.

To put this in practical terms for a hunter, if you are zeroed at 30 yards and your rifle normally shoots an 18‑grain pellet at 880 fps, but the regulator has begun to creep so that the actual velocity is now 840 fps, at 50 yards, that drop can shift your impact by an inch or more. This is the difference between a clean squirrel kill and a wounded animal. A chronograph would have caught the issue before you stepped into the woods.

I don’t think you typically need a chronograph in the field, but having a portable chronograph in your range bag is an absolute necessity if you tune your gun or shoot different projectiles. It is also critical to periodically check your gun, especially when performance starts to shift. Units like the Garmin Xero C1 Pro are compact, Bluetooth-enabled, and capable of live velocity tracking while you shoot groups. For hunters who tune their own rifles, this is transformative. In my experience, this model is the best chronograph I’ve ever used, both in terms of ease of use and accuracy.

This is why I believe a chronograph is an exceedingly important tool for tuning a hunting rifle: it shows what the rifle is actually doing, not what you assume or what the owner’s manual specifications suggest.

Categories: Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Camouflage for Airgun Hunters

I’ve been asked about wearing camouflage when airgun hunting, and whether it makes a significant difference. Much of the quarry that airgun hunters pursue have well-developed eyesight, such as squirrels and woodchucks. Real-world experience has convinced me that going into the woods in full camouflage for these species greatly improves my success rate. Some years ago, when I started hunting tree squirrels after moving to the Midwest, I found that I’d see squirrels at a distance, but not within shooting range. I’d move slowly, sit and wait, and my results were just OK, but not great. Then one winter, while deer hunting and wearing camo, I noticed that squirrels would sometimes just about run over me. So, after getting my buck that season, I decided to go back out for squirrel, wearing full camo with a face mask and gloves. That was the first time I limited out on these wary rodents. After this, I started to camo up on all my outings and noticed that my game bags were filling up. And with squirrels in particular, I found that wearing camo gloves and a mask consistently upped my success. This makes sense when you think of how much your hands move, uncovered; it’s like you’re waving a flag to warn every critter within eyeshot that you’re stalking them. Much of the time, the hunter is looking up into the trees, and an uncovered face also stands out like a beacon warning of danger.

Camo does give you an edge when hunting quarry with keen eyesight. I’m out for spring squirrel here.

Methods of hunting and the species being pursued will influence the camo/no-camo decision. For instance, when hunting squirrel, crow, turkey, predators, and deer, I usually wear full camo. These animals all see well and are easily spooked. On the other hand, I have not observed that it makes much difference when hunting rabbits, feral hogs, javelina, or prairie dogs. It should be noted that when not wearing camo, my clothing is still muted earth tones (browns, greens, khaki) that somewhat blend with the terrain. Hogs and javelina rely more on their sense of hearing or smell to detect sources of danger, whereas prairie dogs and rabbits seem to focus more on movement and range. So long as you’re not in bright or contrasting colors and moving a lot, you will probably be OK.

A white camo jump suit will make the hunter disappear into the landscape.

Of course, even if you choose not to wear camo, it makes sense to match your clothing to the conditions you’ll be hunting. If I’m going to stalk hogs in the thickets or African plains game in the veld, I’m fine with earth tone colors and wear gloves to protect my hands rather than to hide them. When stalking through the heavy growth, it is noise and smell that will blow the hunt, and playing the wind while using shadows and cover to approach is more important. However, if calling predators, I worry about being spotted as much as being scented, and go full camo.

Some times slipping on a camo hoodie, face make, and gloves is good enough. Covering the hands and face are critical in squirrel hunting.

There are several options for camouflage; most sporting goods stores that carry hunting gear will offer a selection. Pants, a long-sleeved T-shirt, gloves, a face mask, and a hat can be purchased for around $100 in several patterns to suit most terrain. You can spend a fortune on very expensive camo, but honestly, so long as it breaks up your pattern and isn’t a completely different color scheme, it probably doesn’t matter very much. Another option that I quite like (especially for summer/spring hunts) is a 3D camo made from lightweight bug-proof mesh. Besides protecting me from mosquitoes and other entomological nasties, it allows street clothes to be worn on site and the suit slipped over when it’s time to hunt.

Prairie dogs will know you are there, movement and distance are critical, and I usually don’t bother wearing camo when hunting them.

So, do I think camo is necessary? Yes and no, it depends on the situation.  In general, there is no downside to wearing camo. In some places that I hunt, I don’t want to be decked out head to toe in camo, as it stands out too much. And if I’m running out for a quick afternoon small game hunt, it’s often more convenient to throw on a camo sweatshirt with hat and gloves. But if a serious hunt for turkey, deer, or predators is on the table, I will most often go the extra mile and suit up in camo.

Of course, another related question is, how important is it to camouflage guns and other gear … but we can save that for another day!

Categories: camo, camo clothing, coyote, crow hunting, Hog hunting, Prairie dogs, Predator hunting, Rabbits, turkey, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

What Makes A Great Urban Hunting Rig?

One application in which I think airguns are the best practical choice is pest control in urban areas. This is the type of shooting that calls for pigeons to be culled from under the roof of an industrial building or clearing rabbits off of a suburban golf course. In both cases these pests can have a negative health and or economic impact, and need to be removed. While the shooting environments can vary widely, there are some common threads: the need for precision, minimal but effective power, reduced noise levels, compact and discreet gun designs, and high shot count are applicable to most situations.

This urban dairy farm has equipment, buildings, livestock, and workers, and you urban shooting rig needs to be up to the task!

The optimal urban hunting gun is one that it is accurate enough to precisely place a pellet in a ½” kill zone at the required range, and is powerful enough to ensure a clean kill. The gun should be capable of surgical precision out to thirty to forty yards. I’ve been shooting a few different guns that fall into the category of urban hunters which I’ll discuss later in this post. All of these guns are capable of shooting ragged one-hole 35-yard groups all day long. With respect to energy output, note that the earlier statement was “powerful enough”; often this type of shooting takes place in close confines, so a magnum power output is not necessarily a beneficial quality. You are often hunting around industrial equipment or buildings, and don’t want a missed shot or over penetration to cause damage to either. For shooting pigeons or English sparrows around an industrial facility, a .177 at 650 fps is more than enough gun. A gun that has an adjustable power setting is an asset for urban hunting.

The reason a compact or take-down design is a positive attribute is that the urban hunter will want to move into their shoot without drawing a great deal of attention to themselves. One of the places I did rabbit control was a nursery located near an industrial park. To get back to the nursery area, I had to park in a lot shared by the nursery and one of the office buildings. Walking along with a full-sized rifle tucked under my arm was not going to work. I have a few rifles that allow me to throw the gun in a backpack, walk onto my shoot, assemble the gun and do my shooting, break it down, and head back out to the car afterwards.

 

The Ranger is accurate, compact, and quiet

An example of a great urban hunting rig is the ultra-compact Brocock Ranger. The Ranger’s folding stock allows it to collapse to extremely small dimensions, down to roughly 17” depending on configuration, making it easy to transport in a small backpack or even a laptop bag. Weighing in at 5.5 lbs, it is one of the lightest full‑power hunting rifles available, ideal for navigating tight spaces like alleys, garages, attics, and backyards.

The gun is capable of generating up to 20 fpe, but includes a multi‑step power adjustment, allowing shooters to tune the rifle for low‑power shots in residential areas or higher power for tougher pests.  The ability to dial down power allows shooters to avoid over‑penetration while still delivering quick and efficient kills. The removable moderator and regulated action help keep the rifle very quiet, a major advantage when working in noise‑sensitive environments.

Adjustable power allows gun to be tailored to a specific application.

Accuracy is always important, but perhaps more so in a compact urban rig. The Ranger uses a match‑grade barrel paired with a Huma‑regulated floating hammer system, producing consistent velocities and tight groups for precision shot placement around buildings, equipment, and workers.  I find the Ranger an excellent option for pigeons, rats, ground squirrels, and iguanas, and have used it extensively in industrial, agricultural, and suburban settings.

 

Backpack ready with stock folded, it is quick to deploy when it’s time for action.

The Ranger provides the performance of a full sized gun. in an Ultra-compact package!

So, to summarize, the urban hunting gun should be compact, have the appropriate power level (not too much not too little), and have a low sound signature. With the right gun, the urban hunter/pest controller will have access to pest shooting areas not available to larger, louder, and more powerful gun. This will, in turn, open many shooting opportunities in areas where other options might be scarce.

Categories: Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Airgun Hunting: Pros and Cons of Hunting Hogs from a Blind

In general, my preferred method of hunting is still hunting or spot and stalk, where I am on the ground and moving. I enjoy working through the landscape to find my quarry, then getting into range for the shot. That’s what drew me to airguns in the first place, the emphasis on hunting skill in addition to shooting. But there are situations in which the use of a blind can be the best way to go, and when I am hunting feral hogs in Texas, I will often use a blind to supplement pounding the ground.

Sitting in the blind with my Rattler .357, waiting for the hogs to come in.

Hunting hogs with an air rifle from a blind offers a unique approach to this challenging pursuit, but it comes with trade-offs. Ground blinds can be camouflaged with vegetation, making them harder for hogs to detect. This animal does not have the greatest vision in the animal world, but it’s not as bad as often stated. But managing scent is especially important since hogs have an excellent sense of smell and can detect human scent from a mile away. Proper placement downwind of expected hog movement is necessary to avoid being winded.

Blinds allow you to set up in prime hog activity areas — near wallows, feeders, or water sources — without being exposed to direct animal contact. Blinds are often set up near feeders in Texas, and a good airgun blind should be within 75 yards, in my opinion. They should also be positioned so that access points to the draw, whether feeder, water, or transit points, can be monitored.

From a blind, you can wait quietly for hogs to approach, using food and water to lure them in. My typical approach at several of the ranches I hunt is to sit a blind in the morning before daybreak or at dusk, to catch hogs moving between bedding and feeding areas. Then I go out on foot during the daylight hours to stalk them in the bush, using my eyes, ears, and nose to find them bedded down.

There are challenges and limitations to using ground blinds, most designs have blind spots, either inherent in the design or due to location requirements, which can make it hard to see hogs approaching from some angles. You will frequently see animals that walk by or hang up outside of shooting range or are in a position where you do not have a clear shooting lane. The most difficult issue to deal with when hunting from a blind with an air rifle is wind direction. If the wind shifts, your scent can be carried toward approaching hogs, alerting them to your presence.

I anchored this boar with the Rattler, at 65 yards.

Now, let’s address the 800lb gorilla in the room: Is this really hunting? It is not as demanding as putting boots on the ground to locate, approach, and bag your quarry. But to be fair, when I go out stalking through a thicket in Texas when it’s 90 degrees in the shade and 90% humidity, I appreciate that not everybody can, or wants to, put themselves through this. Also, when people are hunting a new property where they are not familiar with game movement, property lines, hazards, etc, a blind becomes much more practical. On a working ranch, many landowners don’t want someone roaming their property with a rifle when they have equipment, buildings, or workers moving about. Additionally, in many areas, feral pigs may roam widely, and the most practical way to get a shot, especially for the hunter who only has a couple of days to hunt, is to draw them in. It’s up to the individual to determine what type of hunt they want, a pig down is a pig down, and sausage in the freezer is sausage in the freezer!

Airgun hunting hogs from a blind is very effective effective in areas where pigs can be drawn in, but it demands careful setup, wind management, and awareness of your surroundings. A blind can be a good choice depending on the hunter and the situation. I would say that hunting with an airguns increases the challenge in comparison to a typical firearm, falling somewhere between archery and firearms in terms of challenge. However, if you prefer mobility, quick shot opportunities, or don’t have access to suitable blind sites, other methods may be more practical.

Categories: Big Bore Airguns, Big Game, Hog hunting, Rattler semi auto air rifle, sidewinder semi auto PCP, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Advantages of Hunting With a Semi‑Auto PCP Air Rifle

Semi‑automatic PCP (pre‑charged pneumatic) air rifles are a small portion of the PCP air rifle space, but a few models have carved out a distinct place in the airgun hunting world. The best examples blend the precision and consistency of traditional PCP systems with the rapid‑fire capability of semi‑auto mechanics, creating a tool that appeals to hunters who value speed, accuracy, and efficiency. For me, they aren’t necessarily a replacement for conventional bolt or sidelever multishot, but they do offer a unique set of advantages that make them compelling for small‑game , pest‑control, and especially predator hunting.

I’ve spent a lot of time hunting with the .30 Sidewinder and the Rattler .357 and .45 semi autos from American Air Arms.

The defining feature of a semi‑auto PCP is its ability to fire again immediately without manual cycling. In predator hunting, this matters because animals rarely stay still after the first shot in the event a follow-up is needed after a missed or imperfect hit that requires a quick correction.

The rapid-fire capability is also very useful when multiple targets are present, which often happens when I’m predator hunting. It is not unusual to have two or three coyotes come charging into the call at about the same time. Besides a conventional side-lever action taking time to cycle, it also requires motion that can draw your quarry’s attention to you. Sitting in full camo, the last thing you need is to be moving your hands when cycling the action. The speed of a semi‑auto action allows hunters to stay on target and maintain the sight picture, reducing the time between shots and increasing overall effectiveness.

In general, many of today’s standard PCP rifles achieve a high shot‑to‑shot consistency, thanks to regulated air systems and stable pressure delivery. Semi‑auto PCPs maintain this advantage while providing minimal recoil, a smooth cycling that avoids disturbing the shooter’s position, and getting that second or third shot without breaking the cheek-weld. When I’m shooting prairie dogs at long range with my American Air Arms Sidewinder in windy conditions, it is possible to walk the pellets or slugs right to the target.

A semi‑auto platform doesn’t alter the inherent quietness of PCP technology, which makes it ideal for discreet hunting. Many of these guns incorporate a shrouded barrel or a moderator into the design. Semi‑auto PCP air rifles offer a compelling blend of speed, precision, and practicality. Their rapid follow‑up capability, low noise, and consistent accuracy make them particularly well‑suited for predator hunting and pest control. While they don’t replace traditional PCP actions in many situations, they fill a niche where speed, precision, and efficiency matter most.

One caveat I must mention is that a semi-automatic action does not alter the requirement for intrinsic accuracy. They are only advantageous when they can generate the accuracy of the standard sidelever and bolt-action guns. As an example of the class (and one of my favorites) the Sidewinder is highly accurate, featuring a precision-engineered barrel, which contributes to tight groupings and consistent shot placement even at longer ranges. This accuracy is further supported by an adjustable regulator that maintains consistent air pressure shot-to-shot and allows for the gun to be optimized for specific ammo, such as pellets or slugs.

Knocked this javalina boar of his feet with the Rattler .45 semi auto.

The Sidewinder delivers exceptional accuracy, high power, and reliable semi/full‑auto performance, and is an absolute blast to shoot! But in the spirit of full transparency, it is expensive and has costly magazines. In my substantial experience with this rifle, it has provided good reliability under some very rough conditions, outstanding accuracy with both pellets and slugs, and achieved a high-power output in the125 FPE range ( my gun is .30 caliber). I’ve also had very good results with the Rattler in both .357 and .45, and I hit a running javalina at 60 yards after missing the first shot, dumping him on the spot. The Rattler .45 was generating a bit over 350 fps, and like it’s little brother the Sidewinder, it has proven very reliable.

To wrap it up, I don’t think a semi-auto is a must-have overall, though there are specific applications where it can make a significant difference. I’ve had several occasions where I’ve bagged multiple coyotes, hogs, or rabbits, that would not have been possible with a conventional action. So long as the inherent accuracy of the semi-auto design is not compromised, there isn’t a downside. The American Air Arms semi auto rifles could easily be my primary predator gun based on performance and reliability.

 

Categories: airgun slugs, american air arms, Rattler semi auto air rifle, semi auto air rifle, sidewinder semi auto PCP, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

My Thoughts on Portable Compressors

Portable PCP compressors can improve the way airgun shooters manage their equipment, depending on their needs. I personally like using a CF tank, and especially since I have a commercial-grade Omega Compressor to keep them filled, it is the most effective approach for me. However, there have been times in my airgunning history when I did not have a compressor, and there wasn’t a local paintball or dive shop for me to use. I had to drive 45 minutes cross-town for a refill, which, with the volume of shooting I do, was a real inconvenience. However, if you have a nearby place to charge your tank(s), only do a moderate amount of shooting, and don’t want to invest in a full-size compressor, a good CF tank is a great option. If you do a great deal of shooting and can afford it, having your own high-capacity compressor and a couple of CF tanks is one of the best solutions. But if your shooting volume is high, you don’t have a nearby place to fill tanks, or you’re looking for a solution that provides independence at an affordable price point, a compact compressor can be a good solution.

But even in my situation, owning a full-sized compressor and several CF tanks, I still have a strong use case for a portable compressor. I’ll give you a quick overview of why I included a portable compressor in my toolbox for keeping PCP rifles charged and ready to hunt. A major factor that resonates with many shooters is that these compressors offer independence from paintball or dive shops and provide complete autonomy, but for me, the most valuable aspect is that on multiday hunts, I have unlimited air and the ability to charge to high pressure. When heading out on a 10-day trip to South Texas, for instance, I don’t have room to carry more than a couple fully charged CF tanks, which limits the number of full-pressure recharges. In this case, as the pressures drop on my primary tanks, I can use the compact compressor to top off the guns. This is especially useful for those rifles operating at very high fill pressures. Most portable compressors run on both AC and DC power, meaning you can plug them into a wall outlet or connect them to a vehicle battery while in the field.

You might say, “Just use a hand pump” as a much less expensive way to achieve this result. Hand pumps are inexpensive, but they’re also exhausting, especially for rifles with large reservoirs, operating at high pressure, or when using multiple guns. In the past, I would pack a hand pump when hunting out of state, as traveling with a CF tank presents several logistical problems. But having spent many hours in the hot and dusty outback filling a rifle with a handpump, I can tell you….. you don’t want to do that!

A portable compressor eliminates physical strain and long pumping sessions, providing a consistent, controlled fill with minimal effort. PCP rifles perform best when filled to precise pressures, and many modern rifles today operate at higher pressures ( in excess of 4000 psi), so a CF tank that fills to 4500 psi is limited on the number of full-pressure refills it can provide. Portable compressors allow you to set automatic shutoff points, fill the gun slowly and consistently, and top off refills once your external CF tank pressures start to fall off. This allows you to use all the air in the external tank, by supplementing the charge with the portable compressor. I find that topping off the gun, combining the external tank and portable compressor, allows for a fairly quick refill to the optimal operating pressure.

This is not just a hypothetical “what if?” scenario; I have literally saved several hunts and range sessions over the last few years using a compact compressor. These days, I always pack one when heading out for either a range session or a hunting trip. Even if I don’t end up using it, it’s a great insurance policy. To wrap it up, if you don’t have a place to conveniently refill tanks or want a cost-effective solution for feeding your air rifle, a portable compressor is a viable option. If you have a CF tank and a convenient place to refill it, but are using a gun that fills to high pressure, a portable compressor can be an effective way of topping off the charge. And if like me, you shoot a lot with guns that charge to high pressure, and travel to remote areas to hunt with them, a portable compressor is both a great way to top off guns as well as an insurance policy to make sure you are never stranded without air.

 

Categories: Airgun compressor, Airgun Filling gear, Airgun Handpump, Airgun portable compressor, Uncategorized | Tags: , | Leave a comment

Selecting My Hunting Optics

I was recently asked about my preferences in scopes for hunting with an airgun. While in general, I do adhere to the principle of getting the best glass you can afford, the answer is a bit more nuanced. In this post, I’m going to focus more on key attributes I look for rather than a specific model/brand of scope.

One of my favorite scopes for long range shooting these days is the MTC King Cobra FFP scope.

My preferences are driven by the rifle the scope is being mounted on, the range at which it will be used, the balance between bright and low light conditions I expect to encounter, and the size of my quarry’s kill zone.

For the guns I will use on small or medium game at closer ranges (<60 yards), my preference is for a more compact scope design, with a 1” or 30 mm tube, a 40 mm objective, and low-profile turrets. Variable magnification is preferable to fixed magnification, and I think a 3-9x scope covers the range of potential field uses, from small game at 10 yards to the occasional stretch at 60 or 70 yards. The thing that puts me off high magnification scopes (for this application) is that they tend to be larger, heavier, and require more time to adjust in typical small game hunting scenarios.

I think a 32–40 mm objective lens is good for this application, with 40 mm the best overall choice because it balances brightness, weight, and low mounting height. It typically supports good light transmission for dawn/dusk squirrel or rabbit hunting, and works well at a 3-9 x scope magnification, which I consider the sweet spot for this type of setup. When I am in the Northern woods after squirrels or snowshoe hare, it is not unusual to walk several miles in rough terrain or thick brush, so keeping the hunting rig light and compact is a primary requirement in my estimation. The larger dimension of a higher magnification scope without the actual need for the higher magnification capability is hard for me to justify.

A compact scope like the Hawke AirMax isis the perfect option on a compact hunting rifle.

On the other hand, when I am putting together a longer-range rig for prairie dogs or groundhogs, there is a lot to be said for a higher magnification scope on my hunting rifle. These requirements vary in a couple of important ways from the small game rig already described. I am often shooting between 75 to 150 yards when out after prairie dogs, and the guns I use for this tend to be longer, heavier, and not carried long distances compared to my standard rig. So, a heavier scope is not a hindrance, and in fact can help stabilize a gun typically shot from a bipod. The high magnification is useful in imaging a sub-inch kill zone on a prairie dog 125 yards away, and any reduction in low light capabilities is mitigated by the fact that most of this shooting is done in bright daylight.

With respect to FFP vs SFP, I like both and use both, but again find this depends on the use case. Based on the two use cases discussed above, my preference for a standard small game rigs is an SFP scope. The reticle visibility stays thick at low magnification, making it easier to see in brush, shadows, and early morning light. I find that this provides fast target acquisition—critical for shooting small game that is constantly moving. Also, at the sub-60-yard ranges, a Simple holdover at your chosen zero magnification is fast and easy to use. I find that when using a through-scope camera, the FFP reticles can become too thin at low power, and some of my shooting buddies find this true for woodland hunting in general. FFP scopes tend to be more expensive, which is harder to justify for a gun primarily intended for close-range shooting.

But there are times when FFP is useful. For long-range airgun shooting (60–150 yards) where consistent subtensions at any magnification matter, they allow a more consistent and precise shot placement. This is especially true when coupled with optimized reticles that can provide accurate scaling. As mentioned, my long-range shooting rigs are used in an environment where I don’t mind the extra weight and size of a high-magnification FFP scope. And in these scopes, I am fine with a larger 44 mm or 50 mm objective that requires high-profile mounts.

For most airgun hunting, the best reticles are the ones that help you make fast, accurate shots at varying distances, often in imperfect light and on small targets. Unlike benchrest, hunting demands speed, visibility, and simple, reliable holdover estimation. While reticles are a point of personal preference to some degree, I like an uncluttered system, yet one that still has adequate aimpoints. For scopes on my standard small game guns, I like a BDC or a mil-dot reticle. They are simple to use, quick to deploy, and typically easy to see in low-light conditions. On my long-range rigs, I will often use more exotic configurations such as a Christmas tree reticle, which, when paired to an FFP scope, is extremely precise though a bit more fidgety.

Again, these are broad considerations when selecting the scopes for my rifles. Once you find a scope that has good quality glass with good light transmission characteristics, tactile and stable windage and elevation controls, and an AO that is easily adjusted on the fly, consider the other characteristic we discussed to decide what best fits your needs. There are a lot of quality scopes out there for airgunners these days, and I use a lot of MTC and Hawke scopes myself. They have gained my confidence over the years for their performance, reliability, and build quality, and while not inexpensive, they are reasonably priced and provide good value for money.

 

Categories: Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Pellets or Slugs For Hunting

Pellets or Slugs For Hunting

Airguns have evolved dramatically over the past decade. What used to be a world dominated entirely by traditional diabolo pellets has expanded into a new era of high‑BC airgun slugs capable of long‑range precision and improved knockdown power. But with this evolution comes a natural question: Which projectile is better—pellets or slugs?

The truth is more nuanced than simply declaring a winner. Each projectile type has strengths, weaknesses, and ideal use cases. Let’s break down the differences so you can choose the right ammunition for your rifle and your shooting goals.

Projectiles I use in my Sahara, spans the range from slugs to specialty pellets.

Traditional Ammunition for Airguns

For most of airgun history, the diabolo pellet has been the undisputed king. Its unique shape—waisted midsection, hollow skirt—was designed specifically for airgun velocities and rifling. Pellets are accurate, stable, and forgiving, especially at moderate power levels. Additionally, the variety of pellet heads, which include domed (or roundnose), hollow points, pointed, and flathead configurations, allows optimization for various applications, such as hunting, competitive target shooting and plinking.But as PCP rifles became more powerful and shooters demanded greater range and wind resistance, a new projectile emerged: the airgun slug.

Diabolo pellets are the classic airgun projectile. Their defining characteristics include awaisted shape for aerodynamic stability, a hollow skirt that flares to engage rifling, a lightweight construction for efficient acceleration, but with a lower ballistic coefficient (BC) compared to slugs

Pellets are designed to be inherently stable due to drag. This makes them extremely accurate at short to medium ranges—typically out to 50–60 yards, though the right rifle/pellet combination can reach out further under the right conditions.

The strengths of pellets include excellent accuracy at moderate distances, they work well in nearly all airguns, they require less power to stabilize, they are less sensitive to barrel twist, and they are widely available and affordable. This is still my preferred ammo in virtually all spring piston guns, and for hunting, I generally prefer a round-nose pellet.

The weaknesses of pellets, especially in high power PCP rifles, is they tend to have poor long‑range performance, are affected by wind, and have a lower BC limits energy retention. This can be especially limiting for longer range hunting with more powerful PCP air rifles.

Three of the slugs I’ve used that have had excellent field results.

What Are Airgun Slugs?

Airgun slugs are essentially scaled‑down bullets designed for airgun velocities. They are generally, but not always, heavier than pellets, and are primarily solid-bodied with no hollow skirt, though some designs do have a concave cavity that tends to be less pronounced than a pellet’s skirt. In most cases, slugs have a significantly higher BC than pellets, resulting in improved performance in windy conditions. Slugs are more demanding in terms of the power a rifle can generate and are primarily designed for high power PCP rifles. But even with a powerful PCP platform, slugs often perform better with a higher barrel twist rate optimized for these projectiles. Slugs really come into their own at longer ranges—100, 200, even 300 yards—where pellets cannot perform well in energy retention, wind drift, accuracy, and terminal performance.

Many standard air rifles can provide decent performance with slugs, however, to achieve the optimal performance requires high power, usually 40+ FPE, in my experience, and a kit that includes a purpose-designed slug barrel with the appropriate twist rate. I think there are a couple of conditions to consider when thinking about pellets vs slugs for your guns. First, not all rifles can shoot them well; they cost significantly more than pellets, and in many applications, they do not provide a practical advantage.

When to Use Pellets vs. When to Use Slugs

Caliber plays a major role in projectile performance: .177 and .20 is most commonly (but not only) found in spring piston guns these days and is almost exclusively pellet territory. I think that in .22 – .30 caliber PCP rifles, pellets perform well at sub-60 yards, while slugs tend to shine past the 60-yard line.

However, coupled with the gun/ammo pairing and range at which I’ll be shooting, the application and need for terminal performance will also help me decide which projectile to use. For instance, when I’m hunting squirrels in the woods, Eurasian collared doves in a dairy, or cottontails on a farm, I think pellets are just fine and don’t see an advantage to slugs that offsets the cost. On the other hand, if shooting prairie dogs at 100 yards in windier conditions, slugs offer an advantage and are worth the added costs. Also, if hunting larger and tougher game such as predators or feral hogs, I’ll generally opt for a slug for better penetration even at closer range. Again, the added costs of slugs are easily justified in these applications.

I’d suggest that if you have a PCP rifle that is doing over 40 fpe, and are curious about how pellets will fit into your hunting repertoire, give them a try in your gun. I’ve had success with NSA, H&N, and JSB Knockout slugs in many of my guns, even those without a specialized slug barrel. They come in several weights, and you can probably find something that works for you. Once you find the slug that pairs with your gun, then you can consider the other factors we discussed to help decide which fits your requirements.

Categories: air slugs, airgun ammo, airgun slugs, Safari, Uncategorized | Leave a comment